|
 (04.06.2002)
16.sı düzenlenen Dilbilim Kurultayları tarihindeki ilk adli
bildiri, KPL Ses Görüntü
ve Data İncelemeleri Biriminde görevli Komiser Yrd. Cem YÜKSEL
tarafından 23 Mayıs 2002 tarihinde sunuldu.
23-24
Mayıs tarihlerinde Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kongre ve Kültür
Merkezi'nde yapılan XVI. Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı'na katılan
Komiser Yrd. Cem YÜKSEL "Adli Konuşmacı Tanıma İncelemelerinde
Şüphelilerin Söylem Çözümlemelerinin Rolü" konulu bir
bildiri sundu. Bildiri
Özeti: Abstract : Linguistics method of forensic speaker identification doesn’t only include phonetics and stylistics examinations.
Expert should ask the suspect to analyze the discourse of the text. Because phonetics and stylistics examinations are not enough to identify the criminal.
The utterance is not only a forensic phonetic construction which the expert should have suspect repeat. They have to be examined in text’s discourse.
Only pronunciation is a discourse analysis if suspects distinguish the phoneme on utterance which has meaning distinctive feature.
Discourse analysis method ensures examining the suspects from arriving till leaving the laboratory.
Furthermore forensic recordings and it’s text can be examined together in discourse analysis method. Spectrographic (instrumental) comparison and getting exemplar are easier than phonetics examination. Key Words: Forensic speaker identification, linguistics, discourse analysis, suspect, recording, exemplar. |